Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
107
Highlights
61
Differences
3
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 622 MagGo
vs
Anker 633:
107 Highlights & 61 Differences —
So, Which Power Bank Actually Works Better
Compare two popular Anker MagSafe power banks. Find out which suits your charging needs best.
Choosing the better power bank? This comparison shows Anker 622 MagGo vs Anker 633 side by side — from pass-through charging, charging time, maximum output power & fast charging technology to what users love.
Reinforced Ports
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
with a difference of 32 points
Button Durability Rated Very Good
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
with 5 points higher
Reinforced Ports
Indicates reinforced charging ports for extended lifespan.
with a difference of 32 points
Button Durability Rated Very Good
Indicates the overall durability and longevity of the physical buttons based on build quality and expected usage.
with 5 points higher
Anker 622 MagGo vs. Anker 633 MagSafe Power Bank: A Comprehensive Comparison
When it comes to portable charging solutions with MagSafe compatibility, both the Anker 622 MagGo and the Anker 633 MagSafe Power Bank present compelling options. These power banks share core features such as lithium-polymer battery chemistry, USB-C input ports, and Apple device compatibility, ensuring seamless charging for your iPhone or other MagSafe-enabled gadgets. However, the two models diverge significantly in battery capacity, charging speed, durability, and safety enhancements. While the Anker 633 offers a robust 10,000mAh battery and dual-port outputs with fast charging protocols, the 622 MagGo provides a more compact 5,000mAh battery and single USB-C output suited for lighter, on-the-go use. This review delves into the distinctions in charging performance, safety features, and physical design to help you decide which power bank suits your lifestyle best.
Power and Performance: Why Anker 633 Dominates the Field
The Anker 633 MagSafe Power Bank stands out with its formidable 10,000mAh battery capacity, effectively doubling the endurance of the smaller 622 model. Thanks to its higher 20W input and 20W output power, it charges devices faster and supports simultaneous charging through both USB-C and USB-A ports. This multi-port configuration not only increases versatility but also integrates advanced charging protocols like USB Power Delivery and Quick Charge, adapting to a wide range of devices, including smartphones, tablets, and even some laptops.
Durability is another area where the 633 shines. Its construction features a reinforced plastic and metal frame with moderate impact resistance and a drop rating up to 3 feet, protecting it against everyday bumps and accidental drops. Enhanced thermal management includes a sophisticated heat spread layer and higher shutdown temperature thresholds, providing reliable and consistent performance even during intensive charging sessions.
Safety features further elevate the 633's appeal: it includes foreign object detection, electrostatic discharge protection, and smart power management firmware, all backed by certifications such as UL, CE, and FCC. For those needing a dependable powerhouse that can cater to diverse charging needs efficiently and safely, the 633 is an exemplary choice.
Lean and Light: The Compact Convenience of Anker 622 MagGo
On the flip side, the Anker 622 MagGo excels as a travel-friendly, lightweight companion for casual charging. Its smaller footprint at 2.62" W x 0.5" D x 4.13" H and featherweight 0.31 lbs makes it highly pocketable; a plus for minimalists and travelers. While its 5,000mAh battery capacity is only half that of the 633, it's sufficient for topping off a smartphone once or twice during the day.
Charging capabilities are straightforward: a single USB-C output delivering up to 12W and an input maximum of 15W, with no fast charging protocols like USB-PD or Quick Charge. Still, it supports basic Apple MagSafe compatibility, making it a solid choice for iPhone users who don't need high-powered multi-device charging. The 622 MagGo also offers essentials such as overcharge and overdischarge protection and pass-through charging for convenience.
The build is simpler, featuring an all-plastic shell with low impact resistance, though it does provide heat and fire-retardant materials. It lacks the advanced safety and thermal regulation found in the 633, but nevertheless provides a reliable and cost-effective solution for light users. Included in the package is a USB-C charging cable but no wall adapter, underscoring its appeal as a budget-friendly, on-the-go power bank option.
Quick Take
The Anker 633 MagSafe Power Bank wins hands down for power users who prioritize battery capacity, fast charging across multiple devices, and durable construction. It's a fully featured pack built for heavy use and diverse charging scenarios. Meanwhile, the Anker 622 MagGo is a superb pick for those who want a sleek, lightweight, and budget-conscious power bank primarily for simple smartphone charging and portability without extra bells and whistles.
Bottom Line
If you're seeking a robust, versatile MagSafe power bank with larger capacity, faster input and output charging, and superior safety features, the Anker 633 is clearly the better investment. It excels at charging multiple devices simultaneously and supports a wider array of gadgets beyond just smartphones.
Conversely, if your focus is on a lightweight, pocket-friendly, and affordable companion primarily for quick smartphone top-ups and occasional travel use, the Anker 622 MagGo fits the bill perfectly. It delivers solid basic performance without the extra weight, size, or price.
Verdict
Winner:Anker 633 MagSafe Power Bank - Offers superior capacity, multi-device fast charging, enhanced durability, and advanced safety features for a comprehensive charging solution.
Runner-up:Anker 622 MagGo - Delivers pocket-friendly portability, affordability, and adequate performance ideal for casual, everyday smartphone charging.
The Anker 622 MagGo offers a wider array of color options, including Interstellar Gray, Misty Blue, Dolomite White, Buds Green, and Lilac Purple, compared to the Anker 633 which is available in White and Black. Users prioritizing color choice will find the Anker 622 MagGo more appealing.
Lists the available exterior color choices.
In the battle of Color Options,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What is the release year?
59
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
2021
49
Anker 633
0Votes
2021
Anker 622 MagGo
The product was introduced in 2021, indicating its design and technology era.
Indicates the year the product was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Finish Type
What type of finish does it have?
79
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Matte
49
Anker 633
0Votes
Rubberized
vs
Finish Type
The Anker 622 MagGo features a Matte finish type, while the Anker 633 has a Rubberized finish. The rubberized finish of the Anker 633 might offer a more secure grip.
Describes the surface finish of the exterior shell.
In the battle of Finish Type,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish Type on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Maximum
What is the maximum operating temperature?
104
°F
0Votes
104
°F
0Votes
Anker 633
The maximum safe operating temperature is 104°F (40°C), ensuring reliable performance in various environments.
Defines the highest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Maximum,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
equal
104.00 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Maximum on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
39
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Power Bank
64
Anker 633
0Votes
MagSafe Power Bank
vs
Product Type
The Anker 622 MagGo is identified as a Power Bank, whereas the Anker 633 is specified as a MagSafe Power Bank, offering distinct charging technologies. Customers seeking MagSafe compatibility will prefer the Anker 633.
Identifies the functional category of the portable charging device.
In the battle of Product Type,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 622 MagGo is intended for 'Smartphone Charging,Travel Backup', while the Anker 633 is solely for 'Smartphone Charging'. The Anker 622 MagGo provides more versatile usage options.
Describes the primary usage scenarios the power bank is designed for.
In the battle of Intended Use Case,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use Case on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Country of Origin
Where is this product made?
59
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
China
34
Anker 633
0Votes
China
States the country where the product is manufactured or assembled.
In the battle of Country of Origin,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Country of Origin on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Rugged Design
Does it have a rugged design?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 633
Indicates whether the power bank is built for enhanced durability.
In the battle of Rugged Design,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rugged Design on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Waterproof Rating
What is the waterproof rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
21
Anker 633
0Votes
IPX4
vs
Waterproof Rating
The Anker 633 boasts an IPX4 waterproof rating, offering splash resistance, which is not available for the Anker 622 MagGo. The Anker 633 provides better protection against water exposure.
Shows the level of water resistance certification.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Waterproof Rating on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Dustproof Rating
What is the dustproof rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 633
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates protection against dust ingress.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dustproof Rating on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Minimum
What is the minimum operating temperature?
32
°F
0Votes
32
°F
0Votes
Defines the lowest ambient temperature the power bank can operate safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Minimum,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
equal
32.00 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Minimum on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
34
Anker 633
0Votes
32–113°F
Specifies safe temperature conditions for storing the power bank when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 633 has a significantly larger battery capacity of 10000 mAh, double that of the Anker 622 MagGo which offers 5000 mAh. This means the Anker 633 can provide more charges or power larger devices for longer.
States the total energy storage capacity of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Capacity,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
5,000.0 mAh
measurement.
Based on community votes for Battery Capacity,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 633 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The 633 just offers way more juice, perfect for longer trips. Double the battery capacity is a clear win here.
See more
Battery Voltage
What is the battery voltage?
3.85
Volt
0Votes
3.7
Volt
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
The internal battery operates at a voltage of 3.85 Volt, a common specification for Lithium-Polymer cells.
Anker 633
The internal battery operates at 3.7 Volt, providing a stable power source for connected devices.
Indicates the nominal voltage of the battery pack.
In the battle of Battery Voltage,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.2 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Voltage on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Overcharge Protection
Is overcharge protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Anker 622 MagGo
The device is equipped with overcharge protection, preventing the battery from being charged beyond its safe capacity, which helps prolong its lifespan and maintain safety.
Anker 633
Overcharge Protection is built-in, preventing damage to the battery from being charged beyond its capacity.
Prevents damage from charging beyond safe limits.
In the battle of Overcharge Protection,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcharge Protection on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Cell Type
What type of battery cell does it use?
69
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Pouch
79
Anker 633
0Votes
Pouch
Anker 633
It utilizes a Pouch battery cell type, known for its flexible form factor and energy density.
Indicates the physical form factor of the battery cells used.
In the battle of Battery Cell Type,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Cell Type on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Self-Discharge Rate
What is the self-discharge rate?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3
%
0Votes
vs
Self-Discharge Rate
The Anker 633 has a self-discharge rate of 3%, a piece of information that is unavailable for the Anker 622 MagGo. Knowing this rate helps users understand how much charge the Anker 633 retains over time.
Indicates how much charge is lost when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Self-Discharge Rate on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Chemistry
What battery chemistry is used?
59
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Lithium-Polymer
54
Anker 633
0Votes
Lithium-Polymer
Defines the chemical composition of the battery cells.
In the battle of Battery Chemistry,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Chemistry on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Rated Capacity
What is the rated capacity?
5
mAh
0Votes
7.05
mAh
0Votes
Indicates the usable output capacity after conversion losses.
In the battle of Rated Capacity,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
2.1 mAh
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rated Capacity on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Rating
What is the energy rating?
19.25
Watt
0Votes
18.5
Watt
0Votes
Measures total energy stored expressed in watt-hours.
In the battle of Energy Rating,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.8 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Rating on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Cell Count
How many battery cells are used?
29
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
1
14
Anker 633
0Votes
2
vs
Cell Count
The Anker 633 uses 2 battery cells, while the Anker 622 MagGo uses 1 cell. A higher cell count, as seen in the Anker 633, can sometimes relate to higher capacity or output versatility.
Shows the number of battery cells inside the power bank.
In the battle of Cell Count,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cell Count on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Configuration
What is the battery configuration?
9
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Single Cell
74
Anker 633
0Votes
Series Configuration
vs
Battery Configuration
The Anker 622 MagGo utilizes a Single Cell battery configuration, whereas the Anker 633 uses a Series Configuration. Series configuration, as in the Anker 633, allows for higher output voltages, often beneficial for faster charging.
Describes how battery cells are electrically arranged to achieve desired voltage and capacity.
In the battle of Battery Configuration,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
65 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Configuration on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Cycle Life Rating
What is the cycle life rating?
29
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
300–500 Cycles
24
Anker 633
0Votes
300–500 Cycles
Indicates the estimated number of full charge cycles the battery can complete before noticeable capacity degradation.
In the battle of Cycle Life Rating,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cycle Life Rating on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Loss
How much power is lost in standby?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.1
Watt
0Votes
Measures power lost while the unit is idle.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Loss on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Protection System
Does it include a battery protection system?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Confirms presence of integrated battery protection circuitry.
In the battle of Battery Protection System,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Protection System on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Overdischarge Protection
Is overdischarge protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Prevents battery depletion below safe voltage levels.
In the battle of Overdischarge Protection,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overdischarge Protection on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 633 recharges in 1.8 hours, significantly faster than the Anker 622 MagGo which takes 3 hours. For quicker power bank recharges, the Anker 633 is superior.
Estimates total time required to fully recharge the power bank.
In the battle of Charging Time,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
1.2 hour
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Time on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Port Count
How many input ports does it have?
19
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
1
14
Anker 633
0Votes
1
Anker 633
The device has 1 input port, simplifying its design.
Indicates how many input ports are available for charging.
In the battle of Input Port Count,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Port Count on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Input Power
What is the maximum input power?
15
Watt
0Votes
20
Watt
0Votes
vs
Maximum Input Power
The Anker 633 supports a maximum input power of 20 Watts, which is higher than the Anker 622 MagGo's 15 Watts. This means the Anker 633 can recharge itself faster.
Shows the maximum power the power bank can accept while charging.
In the battle of Maximum Input Power,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
5.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Input Power on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Fast Input Charging
Does it support fast input charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
vs
Fast Input Charging
The Anker 633 features fast input charging, a capability not specified as available for the Anker 622 MagGo. This means the Anker 633 can be fully recharged much quicker.
Indicates whether fast-charging input standards are supported.
In the battle of Fast Input Charging,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Input Charging on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Port Type
What input port types are supported?
89
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
USB-C
84
Anker 633
0Votes
USB-C
Identifies the physical port types used to recharge the power bank.
In the battle of Input Port Type,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Port Type on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage Range
What input voltage range is supported?
9
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
5V
24
Anker 633
0Votes
5-9V
vs
Input Voltage Range
The Anker 633 accepts a wider input voltage range of 5-9V, compared to the Anker 622 MagGo which only supports 5V. The Anker 633 offers more flexibility in compatible power adapters.
Specifies the supported voltage range for charging input.
In the battle of Input Voltage Range,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage Range on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Current Rating
What is the input current rating?
3
Amp
0Votes
3
Amp
0Votes
Defines the maximum current the power bank can draw during charging.
In the battle of Input Current Rating,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
equal
3.00 Amp
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current Rating on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
USB-C Input
Is USB-C input supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Confirms whether USB-C can be used as a charging input.
In the battle of USB-C Input,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-C Input on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Efficiency
What is the charging efficiency?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
85
%
0Votes
Measures how efficiently input power is converted to stored energy.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Efficiency on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 633 provides a maximum output power of 20 Watts, substantially higher than the Anker 622 MagGo's 12 Watts. This makes the Anker 633 capable of charging devices much faster.
Shows the highest power level supported by a single output.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
8.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 633 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
54
Anker 633
0Votes
Power Delivery
vs
Fast Charging Technology
The Anker 633 incorporates Power Delivery fast charging technology, a feature not specified for the Anker 622 MagGo. This makes the Anker 633 more capable of rapidly charging modern devices.
Lists supported fast-charging standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fast Charging Technology on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Ensures balanced power delivery across connected devices.
In the battle of Power Distribution Control,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Control on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatically detects connected devices to optimize power output.
In the battle of Load Detection,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Detection on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Port Count
How many output ports does it have?
19
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
1
24
Anker 633
0Votes
2
vs
Output Port Count
The Anker 633 has 2 output ports, allowing for more devices to be charged simultaneously compared to the Anker 622 MagGo which has only 1 output port. The Anker 633 is better for multi-device users.
Indicates how many devices can be physically connected at once.
In the battle of Output Port Count,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Port Count on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Voltage Range
What output voltage range is supported?
19
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
5V
44
Anker 633
0Votes
5-9V
vs
Output Voltage Range
The Anker 633 offers a broader output voltage range of 5-9V, while the Anker 622 MagGo outputs only 5V. This wider range allows the Anker 633 to adapt better to different device charging requirements.
Defines the voltage levels supported for device charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage Range,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage Range on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
Can it charge multiple devices simultaneously?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
vs
Simultaneous Device Charging
The Anker 633 supports simultaneous device charging, a functionality not indicated for the Anker 622 MagGo. This is a clear advantage for users needing to charge multiple items at once.
Indicates whether multiple devices can be charged at once.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Power Device Mode
Is there a low-power device mode?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
vs
Low-Power Device Mode
The Anker 633 offers a low-power device mode, a feature absent in the Anker 622 MagGo. This is beneficial for safely charging small electronics like earbuds or smartwatches with the Anker 633.
Enables safe charging for small electronics like earbuds.
In the battle of Low-Power Device Mode,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Power Device Mode on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Port Type
What output port types are available?
89
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
USB-C
64
Anker 633
0Votes
USB-A, USB-C
vs
Output Port Type
The Anker 633 offers both USB-A and USB-C output port types, providing broader compatibility than the Anker 622 MagGo which only has a USB-C output. The Anker 633 is more versatile for charging different devices.
Identifies the physical ports used to deliver power to devices.
In the battle of Output Port Type,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Port Type on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Total Output Power
What is the total output power?
12
Watt
0Votes
18
Watt
0Votes
vs
Total Output Power
The Anker 633 has a total output power of 18 Watts, exceeding the Anker 622 MagGo's 12 Watts. The Anker 633 can deliver more combined power to multiple devices.
Measures the combined power available when using multiple ports.
In the battle of Total Output Power,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
6.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Output Power on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current Rating
What is the output current rating?
2.4
Watt
0Votes
3
Watt
0Votes
Represents the power delivery capability under load conditions.
In the battle of Output Current Rating,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.6 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current Rating on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Stability
How stable is the output power?
39
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Moderate
64
Anker 633
0Votes
Very Stable
vs
Output Stability
The Anker 633 provides a Very Stable output, surpassing the Anker 622 MagGo's Moderate output stability. For sensitive electronics, the Anker 633 offers a more reliable power source.
Describes how consistently the power bank maintains output power under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Output Stability,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Stability on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation Accuracy
How accurate is the voltage regulation?
39
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Average
74
Anker 633
0Votes
Excellent
vs
Voltage Regulation Accuracy
The Anker 633 offers Excellent voltage regulation accuracy, significantly better than the Anker 622 MagGo's Average rating. This ensures more consistent and safer charging for connected devices with the Anker 633.
Indicates how precisely the power bank maintains target voltage levels during charging.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation Accuracy,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
35 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation Accuracy on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it auto shut off when idle?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Automatically stops output when no device is connected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatically selects the best protocol for each device.
In the battle of Protocol Auto-Detection,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protocol Auto-Detection on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Anker 633
The power bank offers Apple Charging Compatibility, optimizing charging for Apple devices.
Ensures optimized charging for Apple devices.
In the battle of Apple Charging Compatibility,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging Compatibility on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Tablet Charging
Can it charge tablets?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
vs
Tablet Charging
The Anker 633 supports tablet charging, while this is not specified for the Anker 622 MagGo. Tablet users will find the Anker 633 more suitable for their charging needs.
Confirms reliable charging for tablets and large devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tablet Charging on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
vs
USB Power Delivery
The Anker 633 supports USB Power Delivery, a fast-charging protocol not specified for the Anker 622 MagGo. This makes the Anker 633 more suitable for rapidly charging compatible smartphones and even some laptops.
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery fast charging standard.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Is Quick Charge supported?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
vs
Quick Charge
The Anker 633 supports Quick Charge technology, a feature unavailable for the Anker 622 MagGo. This allows the Anker 633 to provide faster charging for Android devices that support Quick Charge.
Confirms compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge standards.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Power Supply
Does it support PPS charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 633
Indicates support for Programmable Power Supply charging.
In the battle of Programmable Power Supply,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Power Supply on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Samsung Charging Compatibility
Is it compatible with Samsung devices?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
vs
Samsung Charging Compatibility
The Anker 633 specifically mentions Samsung Charging Compatibility, which is not available for the Anker 622 MagGo. This makes the Anker 633 a better choice for Samsung device users seeking optimized charging.
Confirms optimized charging for Samsung devices.
In the battle of Samsung Charging Compatibility,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Samsung Charging Compatibility on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging
Can it charge laptops?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
vs
Laptop Charging
The Anker 633 supports laptop charging, a capability not specified for the Anker 622 MagGo. Users needing to power laptops on the go will find the Anker 633 more versatile.
Indicates ability to charge laptops via USB-C output.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Laptop Charging on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Device
Does it support wearable devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Indicates compatibility with smartwatches and wearables.
In the battle of Wearable Device,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Device on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Current Device
Does it support low-current devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Enables safe charging for devices requiring very low current.
In the battle of Low-Current Device,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Current Device on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Backward Compatibility
Is it backward compatible?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Ensures support for older devices and standards.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 633 weighs 0.48 lbs (0.22 kg), making it noticeably heavier than the Anker 622 MagGo which weighs 0.31 lbs (0.14 kg). The Anker 622 MagGo is lighter for everyday carry.
Indicates how heavy the power bank is for portability.
In the battle of Weight,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 lbs
measurement.
Based on community votes for Weight,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 633 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The Anker 633 is thicker at 0.71 inches (1.80 cm) compared to the Anker 622 MagGo's 0.5 inches (1.27 cm). The Anker 622 MagGo offers a slimmer profile for easier portability.
Measures the front-to-back thickness of the power bank.
In the battle of Depth,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
2.62
inch
0Votes
2.61
inch
0Votes
Anker 633
The power bank measures 2.61 inches (6.63 cm) in width, designed for easy handling.
Measures the horizontal size of the power bank.
In the battle of Width,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
equal
2.62 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Pocket-Friendly Design
Is it pocket-friendly?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Anker 622 MagGo
The design prioritizes portability, making the power bank compact enough to fit comfortably in a pocket or small bag.
Indicates whether the size is suitable for pocket carry.
In the battle of Pocket-Friendly Design,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pocket-Friendly Design on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Height
What is the height?
4.13
inch
0Votes
4.21
inch
0Votes
Measures the vertical dimension of the power bank.
In the battle of Height,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Travel-Friendly Size
Is it travel-friendly?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Indicates suitability for travel and carry-on use.
In the battle of Travel-Friendly Size,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel-Friendly Size on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Includes circuitry designed to prevent fire hazards.
In the battle of Fire Protection Circuit,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Protection Circuit on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Protection
Does it have thermal protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Anker 622 MagGo
The device includes thermal protection features to prevent overheating, ensuring safe operation during both charging and discharging cycles.
Shuts down or limits power when overheating is detected.
In the battle of Thermal Protection,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Protection on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature monitored internally?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Anker 622 MagGo
Temperature monitoring capabilities are integrated, allowing the device to constantly check its internal temperature for safe and optimized operation.
Continuously monitors internal temperature.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection
Is surge protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Anker 633
Surge Protection is built-in, safeguarding connected devices from unexpected power surges.
Protects against sudden power surges.
In the battle of Surge Protection,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification
What safety certifications does it have?
79
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
FCC|RoHS|CE
64
Anker 633
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
Anker 633
It holds multiple safety certifications including UL,CE,FCC,RoHS, ensuring compliance with international safety standards.
Lists recognized safety and compliance certifications.
In the battle of Safety Certification,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Power Management
Does it use smart power management?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Anker 633
Smart Power Management is integrated, optimizing power delivery and extending battery life.
Dynamically manages power to maintain safe operation.
In the battle of Smart Power Management,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Smart Power Management on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Protects devices from excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Electrostatic Discharge Protection
Does it protect against static discharge?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Protects internal circuits from static electricity.
In the battle of Electrostatic Discharge Protection,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrostatic Discharge Protection on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Airline Safety Compliance
Is it airline-safe?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Indicates compliance with airline carry-on regulations.
In the battle of Airline Safety Compliance,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Airline Safety Compliance on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Fail-Safe Shutdown
Does it have fail-safe shutdown?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Automatically shuts down under critical fault conditions.
In the battle of Fail-Safe Shutdown,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fail-Safe Shutdown on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Management & Cooling
12
Thermal Management System
Does it have a thermal management system?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Anker 622 MagGo
An integrated thermal management system is present to help regulate the device's temperature during operation, enhancing safety and performance.
Anker 633
The power bank is equipped with a Thermal Management System to regulate its internal temperature efficiently.
Indicates whether the power bank includes an integrated thermal management system.
In the battle of Thermal Management System,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Management System on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
The device utilizes Passive Cooling for heat dissipation, relying on natural convection and radiation without the need for active components like fans.
Describes how heat is dispersed away from internal components.
In the battle of Heat Dissipation Method,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Dissipation Method on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Temperature Control
Is surface temperature controlled?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Anker 633
Surface Temperature Control is in place to maintain safe exterior temperatures during operation.
Limits external surface temperature for safe handling.
In the battle of Surface Temperature Control,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Temperature Control on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Recovery Behavior
How does it recover from overheating?
49
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Cooldown Required
64
Anker 633
0Votes
Automatic Resume
Anker 622 MagGo
If the device overheats, it requires a Cooldown Required period before it can resume normal operation, ensuring safety and preventing damage to internal components.
Defines how the system recovers after an overheat shutdown.
In the battle of Overheat Recovery Behavior,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Recovery Behavior on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Heat Sink
Is there an internal heat sink?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 633
Indicates the presence of an internal heat sink to absorb and spread heat.
In the battle of Internal Heat Sink,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Heat Sink on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Sensor Count
How many thermal sensors are used?
19
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
1
34
Anker 633
0Votes
1
Specifies how many thermal sensors are used for temperature monitoring.
In the battle of Thermal Sensor Count,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Sensor Count on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling
Does it support thermal throttling?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Reduces power output automatically to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Throttling on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Cutoff Threshold
At what temperature does it shut down?
118
°F
0Votes
140
°F
0Votes
Indicates the temperature at which the system shuts down to prevent damage.
In the battle of Thermal Cutoff Threshold,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
22.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Cutoff Threshold on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Cooling Design Type
What cooling design type is used?
59
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
Passive Cooling
44
Anker 633
0Votes
Passive Cooling
Describes the overall cooling architecture used to manage internal heat during charging and discharging.
In the battle of Cooling Design Type,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cooling Design Type on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Spread Layer
Is there a heat spread layer?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Indicates the use of internal layers to evenly distribute heat.
In the battle of Heat Spread Layer,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Spread Layer on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Temperature Regulation
Is charging temperature regulated?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Actively manages temperature during charging cycles.
In the battle of Charging Temperature Regulation,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Temperature Regulation on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Discharge Temperature Regulation
Is discharge temperature regulated?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Controls temperature while powering external devices.
In the battle of Discharge Temperature Regulation,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Discharge Temperature Regulation on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
69
Anker 633
0Votes
RoHS
Lists recognized environmental or sustainability certifications.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Certification on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Conversion Efficiency
What is the energy conversion efficiency?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
85
%
0Votes
Measures how efficiently stored energy is converted into usable output power.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Conversion Efficiency on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Power Consumption
How much power is used while idle?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.1
Watt
0Votes
Indicates how much power is consumed when the power bank is not actively charging devices.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Power Consumption on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Eco Mode
Does it support eco mode?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 633
Enables reduced power usage to improve efficiency and battery longevity.
In the battle of Eco Mode,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
same as
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco Mode on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Power Optimization
Does it optimize power automatically?
No
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Automatically adjusts output to reduce energy waste.
In the battle of Automatic Power Optimization,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Power Optimization on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Support Channels,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Warranty Coverage
Is the battery covered by warranty?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Anker 622 MagGo
The battery components are covered under warranty, providing assurance against defects specifically related to the battery's performance and longevity.
Indicates whether the battery itself is covered under warranty.
In the battle of Battery Warranty Coverage,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Warranty Coverage on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Technical Support Availability
Is technical support available?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Anker 622 MagGo
Technical support is available for this product, providing assistance for any queries or issues that may arise.
Confirms access to technical support services.
In the battle of Technical Support Availability,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Technical Support Availability on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Length
How long is the warranty?
49
Anker 622 MagGo
0Votes
24 Months
64
Anker 633
0Votes
24 Months
Indicates the duration of the manufacturer warranty.
In the battle of Warranty Length,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
worse than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
lower
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Length on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Policy
Is there a replacement policy?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
Yes
0Votes
Anker 633
Indicates eligibility for replacement in case of defects.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Repair Service Availability
Are repair services available?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
No
0Votes
Anker 633
Confirms whether repair services are offered.
In the battle of Repair Service Availability,
Anker 622 MagGo ◉ is
better than
Anker 633 ◉
, delivering
higher
48 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Repair Service Availability on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Support Duration
How long is firmware support provided?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 622 MagGo
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3
years
0Votes
Indicates how long the manufacturer provides firmware updates and software support.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Support Duration on Anker 622 MagGo ◉
vs Anker 633 ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed Performance
How fast does this power bank recharge devices in everyday use?
Ultra fast charging — Under 1.5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1.5 to 3 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate charging — 3 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 5 to 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 8 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Capacity Satisfaction
How satisfied are you with the battery capacity of this power bank for daily needs?
Massive capacity for multiple days — Over 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Very high capacity — 20000 to 30000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Solid everyday capacity — 10000 to 19999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Limited capacity — 5000 to 9999 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Barely useful capacity — Under 5000 mAh
0Votes
0Votes
Output Power and Device Support
How well does this power bank handle charging different devices at once?
Handles everything with ease — 100 W or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong multi device support — 60 to 99 W
0Votes
0Votes
Good for phones and tablets — 30 to 59 W
0Votes
0Votes
Basic output only — 15 to 29 W
0Votes
0Votes
Struggles with most devices — Under 15 W
0Votes
0Votes
Port Selection and Flexibility
How flexible is this power bank when it comes to charging ports?
Covers all modern needs — USB C and USB A with fast charge
0Votes
0Votes
Very versatile — Multiple USB C and USB A ports
0Votes
0Votes
Good variety — USB C and USB A basic support
0Votes
0Votes
Limited options — Single USB C or USB A port
0Votes
0Votes
Very restrictive — One slow USB port only
0Votes
0Votes
Size and Portability
How easy is this power bank to carry around daily?
Pocket friendly and lightweight — Under 8 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Easy to carry — 8 to 12 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Manageable but noticeable — 12 to 18 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Bulky for daily carry — 18 to 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Too heavy to carry around — Over 24 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Build Quality and Durability
How durable does this power bank feel during regular use?
Feels extremely solid and long lasting — Over 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Very durable — 3 to 5 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Decent build quality — 2 to 3 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Feels fragile — 1 to 2 years expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap and unreliable — Under 1 year expected use
0Votes
0Votes
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging output from this power bank during use?
Rock solid with no drops — Voltage variation under 3 percent
0Votes
0Votes
Very stable — 3 to 5 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Mostly stable — 5 to 8 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Occasional drops — 8 to 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Unstable charging — Over 12 percent variation
0Votes
0Votes
Heat and Safety Performance
How well does this power bank control heat during charging and heavy use?
Stays cool and safe — Under 95 F
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly warm but comfortable — 95 to 104 F
0Votes
0Votes
Warm but acceptable — 104 to 113 F
0Votes
0Votes
Gets quite hot — 113 to 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot and concerning — Over 122 F
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Efficiency
How efficiently does this power bank convert stored energy into usable charging power?
Highly efficient with minimal loss — Over 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Very efficient — 85 to 90 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Decent efficiency — 75 to 84 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeable energy loss — 65 to 74 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Poor efficiency — Under 65 percent efficiency
0Votes
0Votes
Travel Friendliness
How convenient is this power bank for travel and daily commuting?
Perfect for travel and flights — No airline issues
0Votes
0Votes
Very travel friendly — Easy to pack and carry
0Votes
0Votes
Fine for occasional travel — Manageable size and weight
0Votes
0Votes
Awkward to carry on trips — Bulky or heavy
0Votes
0Votes
Not suitable for travel — Restricted or impractical
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
